What is ABC challenging Behaviour?

What is ABC challenging Behaviour?

Albeit a profession working with kids can be fun and fulfilling, it isn't without difficulties. One of these is overseeing testing conduct. In spite of the fact that there are numerous methodologies out there to help oversee conduct, sometimes you should assemble data and proof to assist you with understanding the setting of conduct according to the understudy's current circumstance. This will assist you with building up a powerful methodology. 

In this article, we will layout the ABC recording strategy, and how utilizing it may assist you with examining the conduct of kids you work with. We give a convenient downloadable graph which you can print off and use as a feature of your technique.

What is the Antecedent Behavior Consequence (A-B-C) model? 

A-B-C or ABC recording is a method of gathering data to help decide the capacity of a youngster's conduct. It does this by separating your perceptions into three components: 

  • Antecedents (A):  what happened straightforwardly before the conduct happened. 
  • Behaviour (B):  the particular action(s) or conduct of interest. 
  • Consequences (C):  what happened straightforwardly after the conduct happened. 

Considering conduct in these terms assists with understanding why a kid is carrying on in a specific way. This permits more important mediations as opposed to simply attempting to forestall the actual conduct. 

When gathered, ABC data can give some important bits of knowledge all alone. It very well may be utilized casually by you to recognize examples of conduct and along these lines create viable administration methodologies. This can be applied altogether kinds of settings, from guardians at home, to educators in the school homeroom.

History and Context of the ABC model 

Central hypothesis 

Separating conduct into precursors, practices and results has its foundations profound inside social brain research of the twentieth century. B.F. Skinner (1904-1990) portrayed this as the 'three-term possibility' of operant molding. Operant molding is the hypothesis that learnt practices can be supported by encouraging feedback, or debilitate through retaining encouraging feedback or applying discipline. It makes the urgent connection between the actual conduct (which happens because of a trigger/predecessor) and the results after the conduct happened. 

Utilization of hypothesis 

This idea supports the field of applied behaviour analysis (ABA) which started during the 1950s. ABA buys in to the overall present day see that all conduct has a reason or capacity. ABA endeavors to decrease the event of testing conduct by understanding this capacity, at that point changing the predecessors, outcomes, or both. It likewise intends to supplant testing practices with those of an all the more socially acknowledged capacity. For instance, giving a kid shaded cards to acquire consideration from an educator as opposed to standing up and yelling out. 

Albeit firmly connected to mental imbalance intercession, ABA standards structure the premise of conduct the board procedures in a wide scope of settings from home to medical care. There are even entire books devoted to utilizing ABA for conduct the board inside broad school study halls. 

Present day cycles and augmentations of ABA incorporate the improvement of the useful appraisals, work based mediation and execution of positive behavioural support (PBS) frameworks that we know today.

How ABC graphs created 

ABC graphs emerged from a requirement for better techniques for recording direct conduct perceptions. The ABC technique was first depicted by the applied conduct researcher Sidney Bijou in a 1968 exploration paper (however note that the terms 'ABC examination's or 'ABC diagram' and so forth, were instituted later). 

At that point, this paper was progressive in affecting the manner in which conduct was recorded. Past behaviorists regularly portrayed perceptions as a running story of occasions with no detachment. Applying the A-B-C construction separated these accounts into a progression of occasions characterized by triggers, activities and outcomes. 

Bijou underlined the significance of doing this over different timepoints, and recording practices without deriving any passionate importance. Vitally, working with the ABC strategy for recording empowered examples to be all the more effectively distinguished and better mix of observational work with test work.

Present day utilization of ABC diagrams 

Recording conduct through ABC diagrams is currently normal practice among numerous callings tending to testing conduct. A few reports propose utilizing ABC graphs to help recognize designs behind testing conduct in the study hall climate. (See elementary schools, auxiliary schools, general homeroom, and the Further Reading area toward the finish of this article). 

The utilization of ABC graphs can be especially significant for those people who may battle to express themselves. In these conditions, conduct – including self-damaging conduct – might be filling in as a path for the person to impart their needs and needs. This incorporates individuals recuperating from cerebrum injury, individuals with dementia, kids with special educational needs (SEN) and people with mental imbalance.


The conduct is the move which the kid makes. While portraying conduct with regards to ABC the point is to be exact and explicit. For instance, 'tossed book on floor', 'overlooked solicitation and continued playing with toy', 'tapped pen noisily on work area', 'talked without putting hand up', 'got up from seat'. 

Conduct is ordinarily considered as having one of four capacities (frequently alluded to utilizing the abbreviation TDCS): 

  • Tactile – it feels better. 
  • Departure – from climate or circumstance. 
  • Consideration – from others (grown-ups or peers). 
  • Substantial – admittance to something particular, like a toy or food. 

While investigating ABC information, you can hope to check whether a similar conduct frequently brings about a specific outcome. For instance, if gnawing another kid continues bringing about the chomped kid giving up a toy to the 'biter', at that point this conduct has a 'unmistakable' work. With this information, a fitting intercession can be conceived to energize the utilization of a more proper conduct to serve this capacity (showing the youngster to ask pleasantly), and debilitate the utilization of the gnawing conduct (guarantee toy is taken out from the biter). 

A similar conduct may serve substitute capacities in various settings. This is the reason it is critical to gather data on the predecessors and outcomes each time the conduct occurs, so you can think about the capacity for every event.

What's Your Reaction?